As law school clinical programs have grown in recent decades, many of the newer offerings focus on business law, entrepreneurship, intellectual property, and technology. It is commonly presumed that social justice values, such as the amelioration of poverty or the protection of fundamental rights, are not foundational goals of these non-traditional clinics. This session uses the term “values-ambiguous” to describe these clinics, highlighting the frequent uncertainty and skepticism about their relationship to traditional clinical social justice values. Importantly, “values-ambiguous” does not describe a quality of the clinic itself, it describes a quality of perception of the clinic. In other words, “values-ambiguous clinics” are clinics that are typically not perceived as having a social justice mission, whether or not they in fact do. As values-ambiguous clinics have grown in number and in importance, the broader clinical community has struggled to come to terms with their presence. While it is generally accepted that these clinics provide important student opportunities and contribute to the overall rise of the status of clinics within the legal academy, they have also been seen as replicating hierarchy, undermining the established goals of clinical pedagogy, and neglecting the foundational social justice imperative of clinics. This session, co-presented by the director of a values-ambiguous Business Law Clinic and the director of a values, presumed Criminal Defense Practicum – aims to bridge the “great divide” between the clinics that do and do not have obvious social justice missions. The presenters will model (and invite others to participate in) a conversation between different types of clinicians that they believe is long overdue. It is our hope that this session will present opportunities for all clinicians to critically consider their own preconceptions, and to move toward a more unified clinical community.