The Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. CASA signals a critical inflection point for public law litigation. By narrowing the availability of equitable relief and casting doubt on the legitimacy of broad injunctions against executive action, CASA invites renewed inquiry into the structure role of courts in public law. This panel discussion brings together leading experts to examine the decision’s implications for constitutional remedies, the separation of powers, and the evolving relationship between courts and the administrative state. What normative commitments and institutional logics underlie CASA? And what future litigation architectures might emerge in its wake?