Sessions Information

  • January 8, 2025
    9:50 AM - 11:20 AM
    Session Type: Section Programs
    Session Capacity: N/A
    Location: Hilton San Francisco Union Square
    Room: Golden Gate 4
    Floor: Lobby Level
    The primary justification for intellectual property (IP) systems is that they increase social welfare by promoting the progress of science and useful arts. However, current IP acquisition systems omit examination of the societal worth of individual works. If creations or inventions meet minimum standards under the IP laws, protections issue, without consideration as to whether those creations or inventions address socially significant issues, create ethical dilemmas, or solve problems better than others. This session explores the intersection of IP protections and controversial technologies, examining the extent to which the current IP incentive structures encourage endeavors that benefit the public.
     
     
    Business meeting at program conclusion.
Session Speakers
Duke University School of Law
Speaker

Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Speaker from a Call for Papers

Willamette University College of Law
Speaker from a Call for Papers

Drexel University Thomas R. Kline School of Law
Moderator

Cleveland State University College of Law
Speaker from a Call for Papers

William & Mary Law School
Speaker from a Call for Papers

Session Fees
  • Intellectual Property, Co-Sponsored by Comparative Law - Good, Bad, or Ugly: Is Intellectual Property Incentivizing the Wrong Kinds of Technologies?: $0.00