From legal interpretation to conflict of laws to the law of precedent, scholars increasingly draw on general jurisprudence to illuminate particular doctrinal issues or whole areas of legal doctrine. This program will showcase leading examples of such work, as well as work that questions that move. The program’s goal is to foster a critical discussion among the panelists and audience members about the (ir)relevance of general jurisprudence to doctrinal debates.
The Section held a virtual business meeting prior to the Annual Meeting.