|
Sessions Information
-
January 8, 2016
12:00 pm - 2:00 pm
Session Type: Other Organization Events
Session Capacity: N/A
Hotel: Sheraton New York Times Square Hotel
Room: Riverside Ballroom
Floor: Third Floor
The FCC derives its legal authority almost entirely from statutes that predate the Internet--primarily from the 1934 Communications Act, which was designed for the regulation of a national telephone monopolist, and the 1996 Telecommunications Act, which was designed to incrementally deregulate the communications industry as the vestiges of that national monopoly gave way to competition. Over the past 20 years, the Internet has become the foundation of the communications industry, playing a role similar to that of the monopoly-provided telecommunications services that the FCC has traditionally regulated. There is unquestionably more competition today than there was in 1934, but perhaps not as much as was hoped in 1996. The FCC’s Open Internet Order, in which the FCC brought Internet Service Providers within the regulatory framework initially created in 1934, presents a compelling example of an agency struggling to find a new role in a changed industry – struggling to imbue old statutes with broad grants of power to govern what the FCC, but perhaps not Congress, believes are issues properly within its ambit. In doing so, the Order thrusts the FCC into current debates about the scope of the administrative state, the potential revival of the major questions doctrine, and the potential demise of Chevron. Framed by these issues, this debate will consider whether the FCC’s Open Internet Order fits within the agency’s statutory authority.
|
|
|
Session Speakers
Michigan State University College of Law
Speaker
The University of Chicago, The Law School
Moderator
University of Nebraska College of Law
Speaker
International Center for Law and Economics
Speaker
Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law
Speaker
|
|
Session Fees
Fees information is not available at this time.
|
|
|
|