The Death of a Clinic

Go Back

Session Type: Concurrent Sessions

Session Capacity: N/A

Hotel: N/A

Room: Franciscan A

Floor: Ballroom Level

After years of expansion nationally, an alarming number of law school clinics have been shuttered in recent years. Some of these closings are due to deaths or retirements, while others have resulted from institutional decisions following the precipitous drop in enrollment from 2011 to 2017 or the loss of grant funding for externally-funded clinics. Still other closings involve clinics that have low enrollment or may have run their natural course. In many cases, the political forces surrounding the decision to close a clinic can be enormous and overwhelming. To further complicate a clinic closing, the ethical obligations are both complex and unclear. For example, who is responsible for the continuing representation of the clinic’s clients—the law school, other attorneys in the clinical law program, or the attorney who is leaving? Can the client representation be terminated? If so, by whom? How does one manage a dean who insists that they will take over the closure of the clinic if the clinic faculty do not handle the closing of the clinic, including the termination of client representation, in a manner that the dean agrees with? Now imagine that dean is not even licensed to practice law. Regardless of choice, the political risks are potentially career-ending. To make things worse, the shame that one may feel being associated with a clinic that is closing may inhibit clinical faculty from discussing the challenges they are facing both inside and outside their institutions, which might prevent them from finding the answers and wisdom they need to navigate these perilous waters. This session is intended to create a supportive space in which clinical faculty and administrators can talk openly about clinic closures, clearly identify the ethical rules that are implicated, and share wisdom regarding political strategies that have helped them to survive such closures.