Sessions Information

  • May 7, 2019
    9:00 am - 10:15 am
    Session Type: Works-in-Progress
    Session Capacity: N/A
    Hotel: N/A
    Room: Union Square 19&20
    Floor: Fourth Floor

    Field Supervisers as Teachers

    Sue Schechter, University of California

    With the increase in attention to experiential education and the expansion of field placement programs to meet some of that demand, field placement faculty/staff must be educated and empowered to persuade field supervisors working with students to embrace their role as teacher in these academic credit opportunities.  With programs allotting 2-12 units (generally) for these experiences, it is critical that faculty/staff advocate for field supervisors to take the role as teacher to heart in preparing the next generation of lawyers. Field placement supervisors have a range of supervision experience and dedication to working with students.

    This article will be divided into 3 parts:

    1)      Provide a brief historical overview of the evolution of ABA Standard 304©(iv)- specifically, the selecting, training, evaluating and communicating with supervisors provision;

    2)      Engage in a discussion about what it means to be a field supervisor, why it is critical for supervisors to embrace their teacher roles and why that matters for the student experience; and

    3)      Delve into what faculty/staff can/should do to train and support field supervisors to ensure students are provided with a meaningful academic experience.

    While arguably obvious and ABA-rule mandated that law school faculty/staff dedicate time to field supervisors, given the limited resources many/most field placement programs are struggling with, this is not always a priority.  This article will argue that selecting, training, evaluating, and communicating with field supervisors must be a priority if field placement programs are to serve students and be taken seriously in law school experiential education and clinical pedagogy.

    What Factors Lead to Externship Success

    Anahid Gharakhanian, Southwestern Law School

    Carolyn Larmore, Chapman University Fowler School of Law

    There’s been lots of conversation in the externship community about what contributes to a good externship program/course.  The ABA has been trying to figure that out too.  However, these conversations are mostly informed by anecdotal or collective experience/wisdom and not based on methodical data/analysis.  So we’ve decided to embark on an empirical approach to probe into what contributes to success in an externship. 

    To answer our research question, we are gathering information about four Southern California law schools’ externship programs/courses that are run differently as well as surveying the externship supervisors and students over three terms.  The surveys will gather information about multiple data points and ask that the student and the supervisor rate the student’s “success” at the externship. 

    We are defining “success” based on the 

Session Speakers
Southwestern Law School
Works-in-Progress Presenter

University of California, Berkeley School of Law
Works-in-Progress Presenter

Session Fees

Fees information is not available at this time.