Sessions Information

  • May 7, 2019
    9:00 am - 10:15 am
    Session Type: Works-in-Progress
    Session Capacity: N/A
    Hotel: N/A
    Room: Union Square 11
    Floor: Fourth Floor

    Teaching Written Advocacy in a Law Clinic Setting

    Tamar Ezer, University of Miami

    Written advocacy is a critical lawyering skill and core component of student work in many clinics. This is particularly true in policy-based clinics, such as those focused on human rights advocacy. This work requires facility with multiple legal frameworks at the domestic, regional, and international levels and the ability to integrate structural patterns with individual stories, connect abstract principles to specific experiences, digest complex material and present it clearly and simply, and construct a compelling narrative. There is a rich literature on teaching legal writing, but little discussion of its applicability in the fast-paced law clinic setting, w­­­­­­­­here written products have real world consequences and need to be of high quality. This paper delves into this literature, identifying lessons to be applied in the clinical setting, including both pedagogical techniques and good feedback principles. It further provides an opportunity for self-reflection and assessment of techniques and exercises with which our human rights clinic is currently experimenting. 

    This piece further engages with the following questions: What are important elements in a student’s mindset when approaching written advocacy? How can clinical faculty assist students in shifting from objective to persuasive writing? What are the core competencies students need to develop for effective written advocacy, and what are particular exercises and techniques clinical faculty can use to strengthen them?  How should clinical faculty approach feedback on student writing? How can clinical faculty support student writing while retaining student ownership and accountability?

    Racial and Gender Diversity in Clinical Law Teaching

    Shobha Mahadev, Northwestern

    Caitlin Barry, Villanova

    The CLEA Diversity in Clinical Legal Education Committee is examining available data and analyzing trends on racial and gender diversity among clinical faculty between 1980 and 2017. As far as we are aware, no substantive writing on clinical faculty diversity has been produced since Jon Dubin wrote “Faculty Diversity as a Clinical Legal Education Imperative” in 2000. Recognizing that faculty diversity is a key element in improving the quality of clinical education and moving towards racial equity in the profession, we are looking at data gathered by CSALE, SALT and AALS. Our initial findings are that while gender diversity has greatly improved, racial diversity has grown at a slower rate, and representation of clinicians who are black has only nominally increased in that time period. In 2017, nearly 8 in 10 clinical faculty members were white. The committee will present a draft of our report and would like to solicit feedback on the framing and utility of our research for future advocacy.

     
Session Speakers
Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law
Works-in-Progress Presenter

University of Miami School of Law
Works-in-Progress Presenter

Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law
Works-in-Progress Presenter

Session Fees

Fees information is not available at this time.