Sessions Information

  • January 4, 2019
    1:30 pm - 3:15 pm
    Session Type: Section Programs
    Session Capacity: N/A


    The Supreme Court’s docket shows increased interest in the availability and scope of IP remedies. Global enforcement of IP remedies spans remedies from enhanced damages to tailored injunctive relief. This panel will engage an integrated discussion among experts on provocative IP-Remedies topics including the legacy of eBay on injunctions, reasonable royalties, restitution and recovery of an infringer’s profits in light of the Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment. The panel will explore such questions as: should the status of the right holder affect the relief, especially if the holder uses remedies process to exact exorbitant licensing fees; are reasonable royalties legal or equitable; what are the implications of FRAND licensing commitments on reasonable royalties; what level of intent and fitness relative to other remedies should be required to obtain a gain-based remedy?

    Business meeting at program conclusion. 

Date & Time
Speakers
Sarah Burstein, University of Oklahoma College of Law

Jorge L. Contreras, University of Utah, S. J. Quinney College of Law

John M. Golden, The University of Texas School of Law

Caprice Roberts, University of Florida Fredric G. Levin College of Law

Karen E. Sandrik, Willamette University College of Law

Hannibal Travis, Florida International University College of Law

Session Fees
  • [4480] Remedies, Co-Sponsored by Intellectual Property - Intellectual Property Remedies at the Supreme Court and Worldwide: $0.00
My Profile
My Committees
Events & Conferences
My Events
Directory of Law Teachers
Faculty Appointments Register
Recordings
Order History